On the other hand, zero item produced proof difference heterogeneity between your sexes
Participants
A maximum of 923 children responded to brand new COBADI dos.0 questionnaire (Dining table 1). The newest try comprised generally of females (81.2%), younger (average ages = (5.2), minute. = 17, max. = 50), plus in their first year within school (50.2%). Bayesian inference lets us become familiar with inequitable products in terms of gender since it lets the addition of the brand new analysis to own programming down the road. This new questionnaire is delivered digitally to help you youngsters reading Societal Training and you may Societal Work (Universidad Pablo de Olavide) and you can Pedagogy (UNED) for the educational age and you will . There had been no limitations on involvement, without monetary or instructional added bonus try open to take part inside studies.
Performance
With the George and Mallery (2003) classification, we found that the questionnaire had a high degree of overall reliability (? Cronbach = .83 (.81–.85), Guttman’s ?6 = .86). We also found a high degree of reliability in the subscale “Competences in the use of ICT for the search and treatment of information” (? Cronbach = .85 (.85–.89), Guttman’s ?6 = .87), moderate reliability in the subscale “Interpersonal competences in the use of ICT at university” (not considering items based on a preference scale, ? Cronbach = .65 (.58–.7), ?6 Guttman’s ?6 = .59), and moderate reliability in the scale “Virtual and social communication tools at university” (? Cronbach = .62 (.56–.68), Guttman’s ?6 = .51). The general descriptive results show (Table 3) that the vast majority of students have access to an Internet connection (98.2%). The time spent on the Internet is distributed among the following activities: university work (68.3%), use of social networks (63.9%) and listening to music (53.3%). It is significant that 77.8% stated that they never use Internet for gaming online, and 50.1% never use it to make new friends.
On the results for “Competences regarding the entry to ICT toward browse and you may medication of information”, we observe that both female and male college students feel he has good level of skills on access to “search-engines”, “web browsers”, “electronic cartography” and you can “podcasting”. The tools they use which have less promise are “QR rules” while the production of “on line demonstrations”. Gender distinction is actually noticeable about usage of “digital cartography”, that have a Bayes grounds out-of , which reveals that the content is actually times more likely to are available on the theory one to says there clearly was an improvement between men and you will feminine youngsters compared to new hypothesis of equal competence ranging from the fresh sexes. This indicates which is very strong or definitive facts from inside the rather have out-of an improvement between males and females, which have a size of aftereffect of .34 (.17, .51). Thus, discover proof the men students has actually greater perceived competence in the digital cartography as compared to feminine children. So it feeling try sustained toward inclusion regarding a past shipments which have a keen r factor of just one.5 (Bayes factor = , very good otherwise definitive evidence). Regarding skills into the “online demonstrations”, the outcomes reveal an effective Bayes foundation off 7.30, hence indicates that the information was seven.30 moments prone to come in new theory there was a change ranging from male and female people than in the fresh new hypothesis off equivalent skills within sexes. This indicates that there is positive otherwise generous evidence of a difference in the male and you will female college students, with a sized effectation of .twenty-eight (.10, .45). Thus, there can be evidence the guys provides better recognized ability inside the development “online demonstrations” compared to the female. This feeling is actually suffered whenever as well as an earlier delivery which have an enthusiastic r factor of 1.5 (Bayes grounds = 5.36), due to the fact found during the Fig. step one.